HP3000-L Archives

December 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:09:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
John Dunlop wrote:
>
> Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]> asked :
>
> > Is there any reason why a .com address or domain could not (as
> > opposed to "should not") be hosted in, say, the UK, or a .UK
> > address or domain be hosted in the US?
>
> No reason that I am aware of. I have the hp3000links.com site hosted
> in Leicestershire in the UK.
> I don't think it really matters what your URL really is as it can be
> hosted anywhere in the world.

Technically they are supposed to be US sites, but there are probably
counter-examples.  The only important part is the DNS resolution.  If
your .COMpany has a US office, it could register the top level domain,
and there is very little to stop you from pointing to a foreign IP,
provided you can get reverse DNS back the same way.  You provide the
name-to-address mappings, but the registered owners of the IPs have to
provide the address-to-name mappings (I know all too well, we've had
an unsuccessful ongoing battle with BBN to get reverse lookups to work
for some of our address spaces).

Jeff

ATOM RSS1 RSS2