Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Skiba, Bruno |
Date: | Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:39:02 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Maybe they just forgot a dash?
"Proprietary - property of Cognos" makes more sense.
Bruno
-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of John Clogg
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Terminology
(WAY off topic) I have a question that has been on my mind for a long
time, and I can't seem to find any consensus on the answer. When
reading about commercial software, I keep running into the phrase
"Proprietary property."
I have always felt the phrase is redundant, and I used to laugh at all
the tapes I would get from Cognos with a label declaring that the
contents were "proprietary property of Cognos." Now that I have
encountered the phrase in so many places, I have begun to wonder if my
assumption is based on some misunderstanding of the words.
Would anyone care to weigh in on this admittedly trivial question?
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|