HP3000-L Archives

April 2006, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Skiba, Bruno" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Skiba, Bruno
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:39:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Maybe they just forgot a dash?
"Proprietary - property of Cognos" makes more sense.
Bruno


-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of John Clogg
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Terminology

(WAY off topic)  I have a question that has been on my mind for a long
time, and I can't seem to find any consensus on the answer.  When
reading about commercial software, I keep running into the phrase
"Proprietary property."  
I have always felt the phrase is redundant, and I used to laugh at all
the tapes I would get from Cognos with a label declaring that the
contents were "proprietary property of Cognos."  Now that I have
encountered the phrase in so many places, I have begun to wonder if my
assumption is based on some misunderstanding of the words.

Would anyone care to weigh in on this admittedly trivial question?

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2