HP3000-L Archives

May 2002, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: COBOL MPE to ??? language syntax and feature comparison.
From:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 May 2002 14:10:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
That's a good question.
Obviously the documentation or implementation of HP Cobol was not as conform
with the Cobol standards.
I am looking currently into AcuCobol and finding many things that HP-Cobol
accepted but is/was not conform with the ANSI-Cobol.
Therefore it is very hard to tell.
If you didn't use some of these features, you will not run into the
problems.
e.g. assign to, search, read, read next, tally

If you learn or hear more, please let me know as well

Michael


On Thu, 30 May 2002 11:20:05 -0600, David T Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>Where can I find a cross-reference between HP's COBOL languages and COBOL
>compilers available on Unixen, to determine which HP COBOL features,
>keywords, etc. must be changed?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dave
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2