HP3000-L Archives

December 1996, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 31 Dec 1996 15:27:26 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Hi U-Haul,

I guess I missed the start of this thread, I thought I had a handle
on problems with 5.5 (I'v got 4 systems currently on 5.5) but if
there is a problem with VT, I'd sure like to know. On Sat 4th I'm
going to be updating my 996/800 to 5.5 which has 900+ users all
connecting via vt sessions so any info would be helpful. Thanks

John "Oh no, not again" Skelton.

> Date:          Tue, 31 Dec 1996 12:35:40 -0500
> Reply-to:      [log in to unmask]
> From:          Joe Geiser <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject:       Re: 3000 Networking
> To:            [log in to unmask]

> ----------
> > From: Jim Hofmeister <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: 3000 Networking
> > Date: Friday, December 27, 1996 4:40 PM
> >
> > Hello Friends,
> >
> > Re: 5.5 NS Transport (NST) patches.
> >
> > Currently their are NO General Release NS Transport fixes for
> MPE/iX 5.5,
> > but some are expected to come out at the same time frame as the
> Power Patch
> > (2).
>
> Well, I guess this means that I need to go back to 5.0 --- something
> I was not relishing doing this coming weekend...but if it's a
> difference between a reliable VT connection or being on 5.5, I'll
> take the reliable connection, thanks...
>
> (Why are machines delivered with 5.5 when NS is faulty???)
>
> Joe
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Joe Geiser
> CSI Business Solutions
> [log in to unmask]
> (soon to be [log in to unmask])
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2