I had recently asked, and received some answers on, telnet's use of
resources. I was told that our 996/200 should barely notice the
difference, that there is a noticeable difference on lower end models.
This should be in the recent archives.

I would like to piggy-back a question, if that isn't presumptuous or a
violation of netiquette: on our 996/200, should it matter whether jinetd
is run in the (default) DS queue or the CS queue? Has anyone tried the
latter and seen any difference?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: AJCTHOMAS [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 1998 1:47 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [HP3000-L] Telnet Overhead
>
> A vendor tells me another client says he can't implement Telnet
> because of
> system overhead.  I have never seen anything indicating it is using
> resources.
> Can anyone fill me in?  TIA
>
> Allan