HP3000-L Archives

February 1995, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Gilstrap <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tom Gilstrap <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Feb 1995 12:53:03 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Phil ESGUERRA ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: We've been using Resource Sharing/3000 in two of our
: HP3000's for at least 5 years now. We've accepted the fact that
: is slow.
...
: I know that Netware (Novell) is now available on the HP3000.
 
: Does anyone who has installed Netware on the HP3000 care to comment on the
: advantages and advantages of moving into Netware/3000?
 
We have both Netware/ix and Resource sharing on one HP3000 and you
would *NOT* be happy with the performance of Netware on a 3000 if you
don't like the performance of Resource Sharing.  Without an accurate
measurement, just visual observations, Resource Sharing is 10 times
faster than Netware.
 
We just installed the new version of Resource Sharing that allows
TCP/IP access and direct access from Windows For Workgroups and are
much happier with the performance of Resource Sharing over Netware
(both on the same 947)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2