 
| Subject: | |
| From: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> responded: >Same thing happens here on my 5.5 machine. > >I suspect the help text for :restore is overflowing the temporary file created >by :help because the number of lines listed in the paged output is a >suspicious 1023. The :help command needs to use a higher non-default >record limit for its temp file. > >You can also compare what's printed out by :help [...]54_13Feb199709:45: [log in to unmask] |
| Reply To: | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 12 Feb 1997 00:44:31 -0500458_- Kevin writes: > I am looking for an intrinsic that I can call from a COBOL program > to determine if a printer device exists. We need to allow our users to > enter a device name on a view form. Does anyone know of such a beast? In order to validate the users input to insure that the device that was entered is a valid spooled device (or at least currently spooled), I have used FFILEINFO item 38 and 78 as follows: [...]39_12Feb199700:44: [log in to unmask] |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Feb 1997 22:13:04 -0800 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Interex reports:
>SEVEN NEW TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN NAMES ADDED FOR INTERNET ADDRESSES: UP
>TO 28 NEW REGISTRARS PLANNED
Am I the only one who thinks this is a really dumb idea? Like everyone
who currently has a .com domain name that they want to protect won't
immediately apply for the corresponding domain name in each of the new
domains? hp.firm, hp.store, hp.web, etc. Or that the CocaCola company
won't mind someone creating cocacola.rec as long as they get .com?
>.firm for businesses, or firms
>.store for businesses offering goods to purchase
>.web for entities emphasizing activities related to the WWW
>.arts for entities emphasizing cultural and entertainment activities
>.rec for entities emphasizing recreation/entertainment activities
>.info for entities providing information services
>.nom for those wishing individual or personal nomenclature
.nom?? What a stupid name. And it rhymes with .com!!! Sheesh.
>In addition, up to 28 new registrars will be established to grant
>registrations for second-level domain names under the new gTLDs. The new
>registrars will be selected by lottery from applicants who fulfill
>specific requirements established by the IAHC.
At $50/year per domain for virtually no effort, this sounds like one
heck of a deal for the lucky winners of what seems to essentially
be a free lottery to win licenses to print money.
G.
|
|
|
