Mr Yokem,

yes, I would just be as upset.
does this answer your question?

Now I'd like an answer:
are you upset with the way the peacefull and non-agressive freedom-of-
speech is handled by or in the name of the president?

Michael

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 20:32:02 -0500, Brice Yokem <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Mr Yokem,
>why is everything about Bill Clinton? You seem to use him in a positive way
>or even quote him when it fits and use him negative otherwise.
>
>-----------------------
>
>Mr Baier,
>
>Answer my question.  Would you be as upset if this guy held up a
>sign like 'Remember Vince Foster' at a Bill Clinton get-together
>when he was president, and was then sequestered by the police?
>
>I can tell you I am of two minds on this.
>
>1)  I believe in the 1st Amendment
>
>2)  I also do not want it easy to make an assasination attempt on
>the President.
>
>From what I see here it looks like the authorities were overreacting,
>but then we are in a higher level of crisis than in previous times,
>the press does not always report everything and I am uncertian if
>Michael will conveniently leave soemthing out.
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *