HP3000-L Archives

June 1997, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jun 1997 22:08:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On Jun 6,  5:24pm, Mark Bixby wrote:
...
> Tar on 5.5 *will* do .Z compress(1) compatible compression if you specify the
> "z" option.

That's news to me.  Thanks!.  -z (or just z) is not supported on hp-ux
9.05 according to man and actual usage.

> > How does this sound.?  IMO, we can start using tar now as long as we
> > have a mover flavor of the same archive for our users still on 5.0
> > (5.0 tar does not preserve MPE file attributes)
>
> This still requires mover archives for the 5.0 sites.  You still have the
> "which mover do I need?" problem.

Agreed.  However when 6.0 hits the streets as a push release we will have two
releases of MPE with a functioning tar.  At this point it seems ok to me to
stop the use of mover for all new archives.  Probably the older archives
will remain in mover format since that is the path of least resistance.
So, yes the problem will remain for the old archives but new instances of
the problem will not occur.  No matter what fommat we choose as a
replacemenmt for mover the old problem will remain for as long as there
are old mover archives.

> If a patch was done for 5.0 tar to support attributes, everybody could use
> tar, including the 5.0 sites.

This is a good idea.  If I remember correctly from the construction of
the FREEWARE tape there are other incompatibilies between 5.0 and 5.5 tar.

Jeff Vance, CSY

--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2