Yep, the Supreme Court appointed Bush Lite, but don't dare criticize him;
the response will invariably be:

 a) you must be a commie, since you don't march in lock step with him
and "support our troops" (dissent is unpatriotic, don't you see?)
 b) you must have supported mass murder in Iraq.  My favorite
tapdance:  "Can anyone really say that the world is not a better place
without Saddam?"  (The ends justify the means, as is the case so often with
this regime).  Never mind that the war was justified on faith-based
intelligence about WMD (where ARE they, anyway? Ooops, I forgot,
they "found" mobile labs, so that justifies the war).  Make it look like
those who opposed the war liked Saddam.
 c) this is not unilateral, we have a coalition (yeah, right; compare the
coalition we have now to the one we had in 1991; give me a break).
 d) if the above don't work, just bring up Clinton and criticize him.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *