Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 13 Apr 1996 07:15:18 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Michael asks:
> ...if your application is not coded for logical transactions,
>would you still recommend the use of logging, or would
>you recommend a hardware alternative (high availability
>arrays, mirroring, etc.)?
I would recommend logging, especially if cost is an issue. For
minimal cost, a good backup strategy and image logging roll-forward
recovery offers very good data protection.
I also agree with Elbert's other reason's for logging.
> Audit trails (using an appropriate log list program)
> To review how a program works
> To help debug a new program
> To see who changed something really recently
> To analyze performance issues
> .. more ..
Especially the audit trail. Our auditors love it. So that even in a shop
where high availablity options have been implemented there are still
reasons to use image logging. Our shop uses netbase shadowing, user
volume sets, and image logging in conjunction with a very aggressive
online backup strategy.
--
*************************************
** **
** Chad Gilles **
** Sr. Software Analyst **
** ------------------------------- **
** American United Life **
** One American Sq. **
** Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368 **
** ------------------------------- **
** Ph. 317-263-1423 **
** Fx. 317-263-1956 **
** EM. [log in to unmask] **
** **
*************************************
|
|
|