HP3000-L Archives

April 1996, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chad Gilles <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chad Gilles <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Apr 1996 07:15:18 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Michael asks:
 
> ...if your application is not coded for logical transactions,
>would you still recommend the use of logging, or would
>you recommend a hardware alternative (high availability
>arrays, mirroring, etc.)?
 
  I would recommend logging, especially if cost is an issue.  For
minimal cost, a good backup strategy and image logging roll-forward
recovery offers very good data protection.
  I also agree with Elbert's other reason's for logging.
 
>  Audit trails (using an appropriate log list program)
>      To review how a program works
>      To help debug a new program
>      To see who changed something really recently
>      To analyze performance issues
>      .. more ..
 
 Especially the audit trail. Our auditors love it. So that even in a shop
where high availablity options have been implemented there are still
reasons to use image logging. Our shop uses netbase shadowing, user
volume sets, and image logging in conjunction with a very aggressive
online backup strategy.
 
--
*************************************
**                                 **
**  Chad Gilles                    **
**  Sr. Software Analyst           **
** ------------------------------- **
**  American United Life           **
**  One American Sq.               **
**  Indianapolis, IN 46206-0368    **
** ------------------------------- **
**  Ph.  317-263-1423              **
**  Fx.  317-263-1956              **
**  EM.  [log in to unmask]        **
**                                 **
*************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2