Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:56:24 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You might want to look at the HP3000 wire:
https://3000newswire.blogs.com/3000_newswire/2017/12/2028-and-beyond-this-faq-answers-all.html
and for the HPCALENDAR intrinsic:
bits 0:23 is the years since 1900 and
bits 23:9 day of the year.
I would use the GETVAR intrinsic and pull up HPYYYYMMDD variable.
Olav.
---- Paul Christensen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> External Email
>
> I haven't posted on this list in years, and now I have 2 in the same
> day! Since I'm on a roll here, I wanted to ask another question.
>
> I've been asked to look into using the HPCALENDAR intrinsic. I might
> have used that in the past, but I don't recall it and don't have any
> example of it.
>
> Does anyone have a COBOL example of using this intrinsic that they
> would share?
>
> Now one other question on this; that I want to be sure that I
> understand correctly;
> Regardless of what method we use to get the date - we MUST apply a
> patch to MPE or we go belly-up at the end of 2026 - is that correct?
>
> But if we convert to using HPCALENDAR AND we apply an MPE patch - we
> will be able to continue to run and get the correct date.
>
> And one other thing to clarify - even if we converted to Stromasys,
> that system still needs a patch to function correctly - is that right?
>
> Thanks and stay safe everyone.
>
>
> Paul Christensen
>
>
>
> This message is not from a UTC.EDU address. Caution should be used in clicking links and downloading attachments from unknown senders or unexpected email.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|