HP3000-L Archives

January 1997, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jan 1997 11:03:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> Item Subject: cc:Mail Text
> >Ummm... doesn't 5.5 allow host-based management of a TAC?
>
> MPE/iX 5.5 adds Telnet/iX Server, which does not use a TAC, and adds
> much new DTS TIO functionality, but does not, as far as I can see,
> allow you to configure a TAC using host-based DTC management.

OK, I stand corrected :-)  Perhaps I was thinking of switching.

> If you have a "large" number of telnet users, it should be less impact
> on CPU resources to use a TAC for incoming telnet instead of Telnet/iX
> Server.

If you have a "large" number of telnet users (more than one TAC can
handle), you must also make provisions for multiple telnet addresses for
multiple cards and/or telnet server/iX.  I'm toggling our DNS records
this morning trying to balance TAC and host-based telnet to handle our
load today (fee payment, late registration, start-of-semester things).
Is there a better way?  (140 users on our lowly 960 and climbing)

Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2