Scott McClellan writes:
> >Are you alredy up on Release 5.5?
> >   _X__ Yes
> >   ____ No, but we plan to move to 5.5 soon.
> >   ____ No, and we do not currently have plans to move to 5.5.
>
> >   Comments:  (hopefully related to Stage/iX and/or Patch/iX)

They're great!  Can't live without 'em!

> >Have your ever used Stage/iX to apply patches to one or more of your
> >systems?
> >   ____ No, I have heard of Stage/iX and I am interested, but I have
>
> >        not used it yet.
> >   ____ No, I have never even heard of Stage/iX.
> >   ____ No, I have heard of it, but I have no plans to use it.
>
> >   _X__ Yes I have used it one or more times.
>
>
> >   If Yes, then pleae describe your usage of Stage/iX including
> >   approximately how many times you have used it, if you are still
> >   using it, and how well it worked for you.

I've used Stage/iX to apply all reactive patches since I upgraded to 5.5 in
November 1996.  It works great.

> >Are you presently using Patch/iX? Or do you still use AUTOPAT to
> >install patches on your system?

I stopped using AUTOPAT and switched to Patch/iX instead as soon as I got onto
5.5.

> >If you are using Patch/iX and are not using Stage/iX, please explain
> >why.

I'm using both of them together.

> >If you are still using AUTOPAT, briefly describe why (vs Patch/iX).

I haven't touched AUTOPAT since I switched to Patch/iX.

> >If you are still using AUTOPAT, describe what it would take to get you
> >to use Patch/iX instead.
>
>
>
> >If you are still using AUTOPAT, would you be more likely to use
> >Stage/iX if AUTOPAT supported Stage/iX? (if so please explain why)
--
Mark Bixby                      E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Coast Community College Dist.   Web: http://www.cccd.edu/~markb/
District Information Services   1370 Adams Ave, Costa Mesa, CA, USA 92626-5429
Technical Support               +1 714 438-4647
"You can tune a file system, but you can't tune a fish." - tunefs(1M)