HP3000-L Archives

October 2004, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Nichols <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Nichols <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:34:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Bias?  These issues are not Conservative issues...they are major issues
that have been argued over the last several elections I remember.  It
seems to me that the Liberal side usually wants the abortion issure
raised so they can claim "right to choose"  The site seems to portray an
accurate accounting of positions.


-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Timothy Atwood
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 1:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: Kerry vs. Bush voter guide


1. Who runs this site? I see a link to Project Vote Smart. But no where
does the site say it is put up by Project Vote Smart. And I see no other
link indicating who is running it.

2. It claims it does not endorse any candidate, party or position. If
this is true, why are all the conservative / religious hot-button issues
such as abortion and cloning at the top of the page? Why are many other
issues simply not listed?

Objective? B.S.

So dishonest they need to try to hide their bias? I'd sure as heck say
so.

If you wish to post a site which honestly supports your own bias, and
you clearly indicate it is a site supporting your own position, go
ahead. You are entitled to your own opinion.

But this site is trying to pass off a strongly biased view as if it was
objective voter information. In other words it is dishonest. (And
disingenuous in my opinion). By passing it on with no other comment
besides "Interesting" you are continuing the lie.

If the people supporting the conservative religious view point of this
site feel they can honestly win the election with their viewpoint, why
do they feel they need to hide it as if it was something else? Scared
the viewpoint can't win without dishonesty?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Lalley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:26 PM
Subject: [HP3000-L] OT: Kerry vs. Bush voter guide


> Interesting...
>
> http://votinginfo.org/
>
> or tinyurl....
>
> -Craig
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2