HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 7.0 Performance hit?
From:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:31:38 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
"Cecile Chi" <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:9tc6jf05kt@enews1.newsguy.com...
> I was expecting to see a performance hit with 7.0, but our MRP runs
> were worse than I expected.
>
> HP3000/960, running MPE/iX 6.0: 180 minutes
> (running alone)
>
> HP3000/969(3.75 Gb memory), running MPE/iX 6.0: 51 minutes
> (other jobs running)
>
> HP3000/N220 (4.5 Gb memory), running MPE/iX 7.0: 155 minutes
> (running alone)
>
> The N-class box is supposed to replace the 960; I guess it will do that.
> It will be interesting to see what happens to MRP when the 969 is
> upgraded to 7.0
>
> Cecile Chi

Well, I saw all the techno stuff; but I have an app-based question; they
were all Regen runs, yes?

Nobody snuck a Net Change run in there, I don't suppose?

--
Roy Brown

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2