Ken Paul <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>This problem with DDX has nothing to do with Jon Spivey's problem.  The
>set in question is enabled for DDX but instead of the EOF getting larger (as
>it
>does when a DDX expansion occurs) the EOF somehow was reduced.  At
>this point no one is sure how the EOF was reduced without the rootfile
>capacity also being changed.  What is even more disturbing is that the new
>EOF of the file was less than the HighWaterMark which could mean loss of
>data.
 
Thanks for the missing pieces, Ken. This is an interesting problem. Perhaps
they were using DDR (Dynamic Dataset Reduction...hey, just kidding everybody!)
What is used for backing up the database?
 
Best regards,
Steve Patrick
HP Database Expert Center