HP3000-L Archives

July 1996, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mark landin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
mark landin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jul 1996 14:48:03 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>,, Jeff Kell (aka
[log in to unmask]) says...
>
>On Wed, 17 Jul 1996 13:13:21 -0500 Ed Pudlo said:
>>As I understand it, NETIPC and TCP/IP are two different implementations
>>of sockets and one can not substitute for the other. Is this incorrect?
>
>There are actually three (well, two and a half) implementations of sockets:
>
>* NetIPC (oldest and proprietary),
>* BSD under MPE (limited to C/iX and MPE/iX 4.0 (?)
>* BSD under Posix (either Posix version of C/iX or gcc and MPE/iX 5.0)
>
 
We are partway thru our socket-based app. We are using BSD sockets under
MPE/iX 5.0 with no real problems. We have successfully talked to open sockets
on our HP 9000 with our app, although we have not yet talked to our NT
server (the ultimate goal of the project)
 
 
--
Mark Landin
System Manager
Superstar Satellite Entertainment
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2