Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:01:28 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mark Bixby wrote:
> "Sohrt, Jeff" wrote:
> >
> > What are the benefits of Defraging?
>
> One of the benefits is that it will prevent POSIX programs from dying on fork()
> errors due to insufficient contiguous disk free space.
quite true.
mpe seems to get a real performance boost from having well-packed discs. for
reasons unknown to me (it's *not* my fault, mom! :-), we had quit running our
defrag job on our production machine. for a vast collection of reasons, we were
having severe performance problems on this box. i got the defrag job back on the
schedule -- and the difference was impressive. (just to be clear, the performance
problems *really* went away when the system was upgraded to a 997/400 :-) but
defragging did make a difference)
afaik, both popular defrag products are stable and reliable. i run regularily
scheduled defrag jobs on both my big machines. i don't worry too much about when
they run -- although i do the obvious to not run them during the day when folks are
on the system :-) the job (in my case) isn't long running but there is a fair
amount of io (duh :-). if my memory is working this morning, i believe the defrag
job on the production box runs on sunday morning. there's some load on the system
but everything seems to coexist peacefully.
i think the key is to defrag on a regular basis. over time, you should expect
successive defrag jobs to run quickly because the discs were in pretty good shape
to begin with. - d
--
Donna Garverick Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631 [log in to unmask]
"Unix _is_ user friendly.
It's just very selective about who its friends are.
And sometimes even best friends have fights."
>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<
|
|
|