HP3000-L Archives

October 1998, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
RON HORNER <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
RON HORNER <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:23:57 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
That, or they just ran out of cities to use for names.

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Steve BARRETT [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, October 28, 1998 4:17 AM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: Windows 2000

        Glenn wrote:

        Lars wrote:

        > But a handy shortcut for the "Windows 2000" name might be Win
00.

        Is that like "Win nothing"?  As in what we all get if Micro$oft
takes
        over all of the markets that they want?

        Glenn
        --

        --------------------Reply Separator--------------------

        Maybe we are missing the obvious point of "Windows 2000".  It's
        probably just Microsoft making its OS naming convention Y2K
compliant
        so it can continue the cycle of reinventing the OS into the next
        millenium.  As pointed out above, it just doesn't work with 2
digit
        years.

        Steve Barrett

ATOM RSS1 RSS2