HP3000-L Archives

April 2008, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wirt Atmar <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:34:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Craig writes:

> Ray,
>   
> Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. (analog).
>    
> Did you used to work for NASA?
>    
>   http://www.physorg.com/news127499715.html
>    
> :-)
>    
> -Craig

Don't believe everything you read in the newspaper. This is the NASA press 
release on the subject from just a few minutes ago:

==============================================

April 16, 2008

Dwayne Brown
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1726
[log in to unmask]

RELEASE: 08-103

NASA STATEMENT ON STUDENT ASTEROID CALCULATIONS

WASHINGTON -- The Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA's Jet 
Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., has not changed its 
current estimates for the very low probability (1 in 45,000) of an 
Earth impact by the asteroid Apophis in 2036.

Contrary to recent press reports, NASA offices involved in near-Earth 
object research were not contacted and have had no correspondence 
with a young German student, who claims the Apophis impact 
probability is far higher than the current estimate.

This student's conclusion reportedly is based on the possibility of a 
collision with an artificial satellite during the asteroid's close 
approach in April 2029. However, the asteroid will not pass near the 
main belt of geosynchronous satellites in 2029, and the chance of a 
collision with a satellite is exceedingly remote. 

Therefore, consideration of this satellite collision scenario does not 
affect the current impact probability estimate for Apophis, which 
remains at 1 in 45,000.

==============================================

For a 13 year-old, this is an excellent first foray into doing professional 
science. Although his basic hypothesis is plausible, his conclusions are 
exceedingly unlikely to be true.

Wirt Atmar

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2