HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Vance <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:50:56 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On Mar 30,  5:37pm, Steve Cooper wrote (and some others agree):
...
> PRIV files should be privileged.  SM should not be able to do it
 ....
> I say that the ALTFILE command should not be allowed to work on negative
> filecodes for anyone.

OK.  If later the need arises, it is easier and more compatible for us
to relax a constraint than to impose greater restrictions.

Revised ALTFILE x;code= rules are:
   1) SM user can alter the file code on any file that has a file code
      >= 0, to a new value that is numerically >= 0.

   2) non-SM user with SF capability can alter the file code on any file
      that has a file code >= 0 and that the user has READ and WRITE access
      to, to a new value that is numerically >= 0.

No one can alter the file code of a file that already has a negative file
code.  No one can alter the file code to a negative (PRIV) value.  This
is more consistent with CI commands such as :BUILD, etc.

Thanks for the feedback,

Jeff Vance, CSY

--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2