Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 1999 18:59:31 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999 11:38:13 -0700, Bruce Toback <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>This is reminiscent of an interesting logical paradox.
>
>Suppose that you were to list all the people in the world, in order from
>most to least interesting. Then somebody, somewhere, would have to be the
>least interesting person and would be placed at the end of the list. But
>the fact that they're the least interesting person is in some sense
>interesting, and therefore they should be moved to a higher place.
>
>So: is it possible to construct such a list?
Philosphically speaking, this would not be a problem. Putting a person last
on the list does not make it necessarily true. Therefore, *you* can *say*
they are the least interesting person and leave it to someone else to
determine the truth.
But can *you* have a belief it possible to rationally make a true list? %-)
Jim Wowchuk [log in to unmask]
Vanguard Computer Services P/L
_--_|\ Post: PO Box 18
/ \ North Ryde NSW 1670
\_.--._/ <---Sydney NSW Phone: +61 (2) 9888-9688
v Australia Fax: +61 (2) 9888-3056
|
|
|