Describing dictionaries as "descriptive" rather than "prescriptive" reminds me of an excellent article that I read about the "usage wars" in contemporary English language. Really, it's a review of Bryan Garner's _A Dictionary of Modern American Usage_, but it covers a lot of ground about the English language, how it's changing, what's "correct" usage, etc.
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/1811_302/72732951/print.jhtml
This article is written by David Foster Wallace, who annoys at least a few of my friends (be forewarned), but I happen to enjoy. If you bother to read this article, skip the long paragraph at the beginning, which is just a list of solecisms that the author has collected. Also, be sure to read the footnotes, because (as with much of D.F.W.'s writing) there's a lot of humor/information in them.
Art Frank
Manager of Information Systems
OHSU Foundation
[log in to unmask]
(503) 220-8320
>>> <[log in to unmask]> 07/26/02 11:24AM >>>
<snip>
While dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive, in
their definitions, it might do to consult your dictionary on science as you
did on truth...
</snip>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|