HP3000-L Archives

July 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arthur Frank <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Arthur Frank <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 12:31:48 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Describing dictionaries as "descriptive" rather than "prescriptive" reminds me of an excellent article that I read about the "usage wars" in contemporary English language.  Really, it's a review of Bryan Garner's _A Dictionary of Modern American Usage_, but it covers a lot of ground about the English language, how it's changing, what's "correct" usage, etc.  

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/1811_302/72732951/print.jhtml

This article is written by David Foster Wallace, who annoys at least a few of my friends (be forewarned), but I happen to enjoy.  If you bother to read this article, skip the long paragraph at the beginning, which is just a list of solecisms that the author has collected.  Also, be sure to read the footnotes, because (as with much of D.F.W.'s writing) there's a lot of humor/information in them.

Art Frank
Manager of Information Systems
OHSU Foundation
[log in to unmask] 
(503) 220-8320

>>> <[log in to unmask]> 07/26/02 11:24AM >>>
<snip>
While dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive, in
their definitions, it might do to consult your dictionary on science as you
did on truth...
</snip>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2