According to Steve Cole:
>
> I feel the Workload Manager is a valuable tool and I recommend it
> when additional control is required.  However, the results you actually
> receive may be related to the actual performance of the CPU.
>
 
As I understand you, your speaking of accuracy of control of the CPU on the
smaller systems. What about overhead? That is, does the change in the
interrupt handling cause a loss of performance (obviously, there must be some
cost to using the Workload manager, but the question is how much) and is this
a bigger problem on the smaller CPUs?
 
We are thinking of using it on a 967, which appears to be a midrange machine
these days.
 
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125