Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Paveza, Gary |
Date: | Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:38:39 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hard to manage? Now that's funny.
Full of obsolete technologies? Hmm..I didn't realize that Apache, POSIX,
SAMBA, etc were obsolete. Best get working on my resume.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Paveza, Jr.
Technical Services Manager
(302) 761-3173 - voice
(800) 217-5808 - pager
-----Original Message-----
From: dsilva [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 2:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [HP3000-L] If there are HP people in this forum they
would be laughing big time....
<< "PSST ... Carly we want to let the world in on your secret ...
with the HP
e3000 your organization manages the manufacturing of over $20Billion
of
products>>
The systems you are talking about are a "web" of
inconsistencies, hard to trace, hard to research, hard to manage, poorly
documented, of very cumbersome design, full of holes, obsolete technologies
and on and on, product of years of a mix of changing technologies and
constant upward/task change and "promotions" of the very hp employees that
designed these systems. That is why HP is doing a lot of migrating. That
is why HP is about invent and change. Because they have no choice,
otherwise the giant will drop like a rock from within.
Whatever you think the big giant is, chances are that you are
wrong unless you have been there. I dag the giant deeper than a lot of
people I know, through out and worldwide. What I found would make a grade
school programmer apprentice look like a pro.
Concerning uptime hardware and operating system wise they have
a stable platform, so do others.
I am not trying to create conflict here but it amazes me to
read about this and the "collection" effort in progress. Anybody with some
"cloud" can get a first hand impression from the horse's mouth if they try
hard enough.
|
|
|