Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Jan 1995 21:57:54 GMT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Guy Smith ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: Larry Boyd ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: > I have an additionally suggestion. What if HP selected a filecode that
: > would define command files? If the file is ASCII it would still work, and
: > if the file is binary, the code could be checked.
: I wish to respectfully disagree. Being the type who never remembers to
: do a chmod on my UNIX scripts, and who then spends several seconds in
: dememtia figuring out why the script won't run, I know I'd make the same
: omission with file codes.
I will strongly second that. I have the same problem with my occasional
UNIX scripts. 90% of the command files I write (MPE or UNIX) are
quick and dirty, emphasis on quick. Hop in the editor, type out
a couple of lines, and let the system do the typing. I _don't_ want
to fool around with file codes, chmods, etc.
Hmmm, speaking of which, I'll bet I could ...
$ cat mkcmd
vi $1
chmod u+x $1
ll $1
there, perfect example, q&d homebrew for the unix side. Don't forget to
chmod the mkcmd file though :-)
Dave Day - CSY Performance Consulting
|
|
|