HP3000-L Archives

March 2002, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Hula <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:05:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
As far as I know, 9x7 systems can't go beyond 6.5 PP2
    Tom Hula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Smeltzer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:00 AM
Subject: [HP3000-L] Upgrade from 6.0 to ?


> With Sept. 1, 2002 end-of-support date for 6.0 coming, we need to decide
> where to upgrade to, so that we can continue to pay HP to support our
> production HP3000s.
> I have found HP3000-L postings around the release dates of 7.0 and 7.0 e1.
> There are postings of several 7.0 issues including performance, several
> patches, and the failings of CSTM, but few postings of experiences in
> taking a large series 997 or 969 'e'3000 to 7.0.
> Is 7.0 e1 that stable, that no issues have been posted, or have that few
> companies gone to 7.0 with large production 9xx systems?
>
> FYI: Last fall we were forced to backdate from 6.5 pp2.  HP assures us
that
> all issues have been addressed, and we can safely move to 6.5 or 7.0.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2