(I fixed your quote. Please don't top-post.)
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 06:16:15AM -0600, Joseph Dolliver wrote:
> Jay Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:26:20AM -0600, Joseph Dolliver wrote:
> > > YOU CAN ALWAYS HIT THE DELETE BUTTON.
> > This is the standard spammer's argument. The problem is that it doesn't
> > scale. My system - with just a few users - rejected 10631 spams last week.
> I can't imagine that you are SPAMMED in the 3000-l mail 10631 times.
No, I wasn't. I was spammed that many times, period. (Plus the few hundred
that made it past my spam filters.)
It doesn't matter whether it was from this list or not. If everyone thinks
"well, there's not much spam from this list, so a few more is okkay", then
we're back in the same boat.
Spam is *NEVER* okkay. Period. It is unacceptable, no matter who sends it,
no matter in what forum, no matter for what purpose. Spammers are vile.
Spamming should be considered as antisocial as any other form of theft.
> Did you ever put a filter on your mail?
Yes. That's why I didn't waste more time on deleting spam.
That doesn't matter. No spam is acceptable, period.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
http://www.hercules-390.org (Yes, that's me!)
Buy Hercules stuff at http://www.cafepress.com/hercules-390
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|