Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 1997 22:51:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> From: Tracy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Bandwidth
> Date: Thursday, March 06, 1997 1:01 PM
>
> Why do we use the term "Bandwidth" on the Net?
>
Simply, Tracy, because that's exactly what it is. Bandwidth applies not
only to radio bands, but also the frequency over the wire as well.
Simply put, a query which returns 5 rows utilizes less bandwidth (a lower
transmission burst) than a query which returns 500 or 1000 rows.
Transmission of too much data over a given wire can cause retransmission
or worse, collission. It's why a net running at 100 megabits can handle
more data over a given network than a net running at 10. Also, why
trying
to run the same amount of data over a 56K link as well as a 10M link -
which one will give you the better response?
It's true that data does enter the pipe serially, but the data has to get
the chance to get in the pipe. If there so much running through that
pipe, that the data cannot enter, you are running out of bandwidth.
That's the simple answer. I'm sure that someone else would give all the
technical details, for which I'm to bleary-eyed to type --- now back to
the bandwidth problem I'm experiencing with my mail server <g> --- I have
to get the rest of this list (39 messages) which did not come down
because
the server timed out (bandwidth overload)...hmmm - a timely topic :-)
Best,
Joe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Geiser
CSI Business Solutions
140 Bristol-Oxford Valley Road, Suite 102
Langhorne, PA 19047-3083
Toll Free (US/Canada): (888) 956-9812
[log in to unmask] (at work)
[log in to unmask] (at play)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|