I feel like watching "Les Miserables", and putting Ms. Dunn in the
character of "Javert".
Since there are two victims I'd have to split "Jean Valjean" into two
characters.
Which board member should play "Jean Valjean" and which "24601"?
Tracy Johnson
Measurement Specialties, Inc.
BT
NNNN
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Senn, Bruce
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Patricia Dunn will step down
>
>
> So, what is wrong with this picture?
>
> The two board members, whose privacy was allegedly violated,
> resign, and the instigator of the investigation, just has to
> move her chair from the head of the board table to the side.
>
> The "leakers" are gone and the "overzealous investigator"
> continues to govern HP.
>
> Bruce.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ----
> Bruce J. Senn Phone: (518) 388-6664
> Senior System Manager FAX: (518) 388-6458
> Union College E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Schenectady, NY 12308 WWW: http://www1.union.edu/~sennb
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ----
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ron Seybold
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 3:10 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Patricia Dunn will step down
>
> Hello Friends:
>
> Can you tell us how HP's privacy blunder affects your relationship
> with the company?
>
> We've posted a new article on our NewsWire NewsBlog
> <http://3000newswire.com/blog> about today's developments. Much more
> interesting than HP's main press release on the matter is the
> company's report on director Keyworth's resignation.
>
> HP was careful to express its regret for violating the privacy of its
> directors, now both resigned: Keyworth and Tom Perkins. No such
> regrets have yet been delivered for hounding the personal phone
> records of close to a dozen reporters and their family members.
>
> We should all keep in mind there are two HPs: the one that allowed
> this blunder to happen, without adequate oversight; and the one that
> still serves the 3000 community at the "worker bee" level. I already
> have Alfredo Rego's well-crafted reply in hand, responding to our
> spot poll on the impact of this investigative hoax.
>
> I invite you all to answer the same question that Alfredo did,
> whether you're continuing with HP as your enterprise vendor, or
> staying on the 3000 but separating from HP.
>
> For the record, the legality of these tactics is still in play. If
> criminal or civil claims arise from this hoax, we can all hope that
> "pretexting" becomes as illegal as ethics make it appear.
> --
>
> Ron Seybold, Editor In Chief
> The 3000 NewsWire -- 512.331.0075 -- [log in to unmask]
> Independent Information to Maximize Your HP 3000 NewsWire
> Blog -- http://3000newswire.com/blog Main Web site --
> http://www.3000newswire.com
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
