HP3000-L Archives

June 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sletten Kenneth W KPWA <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sletten Kenneth W KPWA <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:23:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
G. muses:

> Pete writes:
> > A customer of theirs has mirrored disks, 4 9gb drives. Is
> > it possible just to replace them with 4 18gb drives without a re-
> > load or anything?
>
> You *might* get away with replacing each side of the mirror
> with bigger disks (one side at a time followed by resyncing), but
> then you would end up with 18GB disks that you could only use
> 9GB of, since the on-disk structures like the free space bitmap
> would still be those of a 9GB drive.

While I won't bet the ranch G.'s above cannot be made to work, all
the manuals and info I have on Mirror Disc/iX sez that the two
spindles in a mirror pair have to be an EXACT match in every way
(at least in every detectable difference, whatever that is)...  If the
two discs ID themselves with different model numbers, I'm relatively
sure that alone will prevent inserting the spindle as one side of a
mirror pair....    If anybody thinks I'm wrong about that, I would be
interested in hearing any evidence to the contrary....

Ken Sletten

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2