HP3000-L Archives

October 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kevin Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:26:38 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (100 lines)
I for one have lived the horror story and I've never been more happy to
spend (the company's) money to get off of the 12Hs.  If you have a low
amount of I/O then the 12Hs might be for you.  In a heavy I/O
environment, you wouldn't like to see just how slow your system can
perform.

No urban myth here.  We had serious performance problems.  We are
running at a minimum of 4-5 times faster on the XP256 disc array and
this is without any changes to memory or any other system component.
Yes, you read that right 400% - 500% better!!!

Kevin

Steve Belkacem wrote:
>
> Apologies if I misled here. I am basically looking at
> both options Mirroring and 12H.
>
> Mirroring is the system we currently have, and does
> not seem to work correctly.
>
> The 12H raid option is the sytem which we are
> currently looking towards and I need to find out if it
> is a good solution, or if the horror stores if slow
> performace and the ARM utility are an urban myth.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
> --- Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >
> Question,  why use mirroring on an 12h disc array?
> > When we set up a new
> > system here we had a 12h fully loaded configured in.
> >  Within the first 2
> > months we had 2 drives fail.  The system slowed down
> > (considerable)
> > while it rebuilt the bad drive but the system never
> > went down.
> >
> > Steve Belkacem wrote:
> >
> > > Hi people,
> > >
> > > 1. We currently use mirroring on out production
> > > machines. The feeling is that it is not a very
> > good
> > > system due to every time a primary disc has failed
> > ,
> > > the switchover to the secondary drive has not
> > happened
> > > and therefore the software is a waste of time.
> > >
> > > I am , in a very open minded way, presuming that
> > this
> > > is due to the mirroring was setup incorrectly at
> > the
> > > time . Would this be a correct assuption ?
> > >
> > > Would any users of the system please give me their
> > > opinion on this.
> > >
> > > 2. 12H Autoraid.
> > > Again I'd like to hear other peoples thoughts on
> > this.
> > > >From being in a position where I was happy to
> > move to
> > > this, I keep hearing horror stories (not direct)
> > which
> > > is unsettling to say the least.
> > >
> > > 3. Any other solution for the resilance ?
> > >
> > > Many Thanks in Advance
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at
> > http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> > > or your free @yahoo.ie address at
> > http://mail.yahoo.ie
> >
> > --
> > Larry Barnes
> > Director of I.T.
> > Mitek Corp.
> > 602-438-4545 x1366
> > Phoenix, AZ 85040
> >
> > Check Us Out !
> > http://www.mitekcorp.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
> or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

ATOM RSS1 RSS2