HP3000-L Archives

October 2004, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Baier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:34:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Seems there is a reason. Some GOP are very dirty it seems like

Dems Demand Quick N.H. Phone-Jam Inquiry
By ERIK STETSON, Associated Press Writer

CONCORD, N.H. - Democrats are accusing the Justice Department of playing
politics by trying to delay an inquiry into whether President Bush's New
England campaign chief played a role in illegal phone-jamming on Election
Day 2002.

Computer-generated calls were made to get-out-the-vote phones run by
Democrats and the nonpartisan Manchester firefighters' union. More than 800
hang-up calls tied up phones for about 1 1/2 hours.

Last summer, the former executive director of the state GOP pleaded guilty
to a conspiracy charge and admitted paying $15,600 to a Virginia
telemarketing company that hired another business to make the calls.

The state Democratic Party asked for an immediate hearing Friday to get
permission to question GOP officials under oath after a last-minute Justice
Department request delayed a questioning session set for Thursday.

In legal filings Thursday, Democrats said they believe Jim Tobin, the New
England director of the Bush-Cheney campaign, was involved in the phone
jamming. In 2002, Tobin was northeast political director for the Republican
Senatorial Committee, the party operation working to elect Republicans to
the Senate. He did not return a phone call seeking comment.

"The sudden cooperation between the Department of Justice and the New
Hampshire Republican Party strongly suggests that the Department of Justice
has intervened at this late moment in an attempt to prevent a Republican
Party operative from being publicly identified, disclosed and possibly
removed from his position because of his alleged involvement in electoral
fraud," Democrats said in a motion filed in Superior Court in Manchester.




On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:13:51 -0700, Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>At 09:00 AM 10/14/2004, Michael Baier wrote:
>>Larry,
>>
>>glad you didn't say the year. We'll have dozens of recounts and maybe even
>>re-votes before Dan can make the announcement. ;->
>>
>
>you can be sure of that, just check out the new DNC action plan at
>http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc66.htm
>
>
>>On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:57:48 -0700, Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Sorry, I was too quick on the delete key.  But someone asked who won the
>> >debate.
>> >
>> >You will have to wait until Dan Rather makes that announcement on Nov. 2
>> >at 6:00PM PST!
>> >
>> >* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>> >* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>>
>>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Shawn Gordon
>President
>theKompany.com
>www.thekompany.com
>949-713-3276
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2