If you carry this to the limit there should be no services via jinetd, each
should be an independent job.
-------------------------------------------------
Larry Simonsen Phone: 801-489-2450
Flowserve Corporation Fax: 801-491-1750
PO Box 2200 http://www.Flowserve.com
Springville, UT 84663 e-mail: [log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------------
All opinions expressed herein are my own and reflect, in no way, those of my
employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Bixby [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Simonsen, Larry
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: sendmail - hp supported.
"Simonsen, Larry" wrote:
>
> > it would be nice that since sendmail uses syslog to have >
syslog
> and then
> > sendmail added as part of the inet daemon.
> >
> > I know that it makes the job larger for the number of >
processes
> but would
> > reduce the number of background jobs running on the system.
>
> any other comments on this?
For performance reasons, you don't want to run syslog under inetd, and the
way
the MPE syslog daemon is currently written, you can't run it under inetd
anyway.
IIRC, sendmail has an inetd mode for handling incoming e-mail. But you
would
still have to run a batch job so sendmail would periodically process the
outbound queue, so using inetd doesn't gain you anything.
Why exactly is a large number of background jobs a bad thing? Please be
specific. If it's because it makes :SHOWJOB listings cluttered, well, it's
easy to write a UDC or command file that filters out the background stuff
from
:SHOWJOB output and just shows you the "interesting" jobs. I did this back
at
cccd.edu, and called it SJX for "ShowJob eXclude".
--
[log in to unmask]
Remainder of .sig suppressed to conserve scarce California electrons...
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
