Item Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Re[2]: FW: HP World - HP 3000 Rebirth Celebration              - sloga ns
Gavin writes:

> Am I the only one who thinks that August 1998 is a little late to be
> crowing about Year 2000 compliance?  I don't think this is something
> that we should be spending a lot of effort to point out at this time.
> Maybe some oblique reference to "of *course* it's year 2000 compliant"
[snip]

On the one hand, I agree.

On the other, "at least one" other supported server OS is not yet
y2k compliant. And, NEWS.COM has a story about the federal gov't
earmarking about $5 *billion* for y2k fixes.

So, since the issue still has a fair amount of mind share,
it seems that it needs to be mentioned.

--Glenn Cole
  Software al dente, Inc.
  [log in to unmask]