HP3000-L Archives

October 1995, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Paul H. Christidis" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 27 Oct 1995 10:28:19 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
>Author:  David Blacketer <[log in to unmask]> at CCGATE
>Date:    10/27/1995 10:05 AM
 
 
>Does anyone have any experience with portable NETWARE under MPE/IX 5.0 running
>on a 959/300 box, specifically in regards to aborts, system halts and other
>unusual behavior?
 
>We have an existing 3 year old 957RX server running identical versions of ALL
>software including the latest patches as of early October, which behaves
>perfectly.
 
>The same can not be said for our new 959/300.
 
>Thanks in advance for your response!
 
 
We are running portable NETWARE in order to accommodate our printing.(We use
nbspool in conjunction with NETWARE/iX to move files to a number of Novell
servers.
 
We have not had any system aborts that could be attributed to NETWARE but we
have had many occasions where the nbspool process goes into some loop and
consumes most of the cpu.  Quest (nbspool) is pointing the finger to HP and HP
is pointing back at Quest.
 
I'll report back to this list if any resolution is achieved.
 
Paul H. Christidis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2