At  02:45 PM 11/10/2002, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>There are legitimate approaches to the analyses of complex problems.

I already said I agree with your analysis of the data you presented.  And I
don't question the data.  The point I was trying to make is that the choice
should be regarding what outcome each of us prefers.

>Quoting science fiction authors is not one of them.

Literature (even science fiction) is at its best when it illuminates
reality.  Like hard science which provides models to help us understand and
predict the reality of the universe, quality fiction can provide models of
behavior for large and small social groups that can help us understand
ourselves and the reality of civilization more effectively.  In any case,
Heinlein was a very capable philosopher who didn't hesitate to portray his
world view in his writing.  The test of his theories and proverbs should be
analogous to those used in science:  Is it consistent with the observed
data and does it make predictions that can be tested?

I never expected most folks to agree with my perspective, or even with the
concepts reflected in the quotations I selected for my prior message.  I
would simply encourage people who think for themselves to reflect on
whether those points in particular and Heinlein's philosophy make sense to
them.  There's no penalty or reward whether anyone agrees or disagrees.  If
a few people pause to consider the concepts, then my post was worth sending.

I wish y'all well.

--
Jeff Woods
 From "The Pinnacle" by Kansas:
"With Glory and Passion no longer the fashion, the Hero breaks his Sword."

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *