Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:39:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wirt after John,
<original snipped>
> A lot of people think that web-based internet transactions
> are difficult to
> program up, but as John explains here, they don't need to be.
<rest snipped>
It's not rocket science - a lot depends on the tool.
As Michael Gueterman pointed out earlier -- and he turned me on to this
tool... I will use Cold Fusion whenever possible. It handles state
management for me, so I don't have to, and it does so quite nicely.
Drawback: CF runs on NT and Unix. NT to the 3000 is quite speedy though.
If you took the SIGIMAGE ballot last year, you actually used a Cold Fusion
app, went through an NT box, to a 3000. (When it was launched, the NT box
was in Washington State and the 3000 here on the East Coast - and people
were STILL getting response times that were incredible). It's not a couple
hundred dollars though (unless you get just the runtime version, where a
developer wrote the application for you).
There are plusses and minuses in both camps: Using an App server such as
Cold Fusion gets your application up and running faster, and provides a lot
of extras to boot. CGI (Perl, or even COBOL) provides everything on one
box, but there are firewall considerations and so forth.
Cheers,
Joe
|
|
|