HP3000-L Archives

August 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Landin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 07:32:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
 On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 06:31:55 -0500 (Central Daylight Time), "John R.
Wolff" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

><snip>
>>For example, one customer went from three IT people (1 programmer, 1
>>system manager, and 1 operator) on ONE HPe3000 to 14 IT people on NINE
>>HP9000s.
><snip>
>
>Hello Ben -
>
>Even if the migration technically works, how can you call going from 3 IT
>people with 1 HPe3000 to 14 IT people on 9 HP9000's successful?

The Bottom Line. The only measure of "successful" in business is that
you are more profitable in the long run. If they make more money with
the new system, then it was successful.

Which is perhaps why you don't see a lot of non-profits going to SAP.
:)

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2