HP3000-L Archives

April 1995, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Apr 1995 15:53:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
According to Kevin D. Joseph:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are in the process of evaluating the risks involved in moving from 4.0
> to 5.0.  Currently we have to machines (967 for production, 918 for
> development).  We would like to put 5.0 on the development machine first.
> So here are my questions.  Will we have any problems compiling code under
> 5.0 (COBOL,C,FORTRAN,Pascal,Powerhouse) and running the code under 4.0?
> Is anyone currently in a similar situation?  Any hints, tips, etc. would
> be greatly appreciated.
>
We also have a 918 for development and a 967 for production!
We have been using the limited release of 5.0 on the 918 for development
since Nov. '94 and just recently upgraded it to the general release.
We have not had any problems using it for development and then
copying over the code. We run almost all powerhouse, but we do use
a little cobol.
We are tentatively planning a 5.0 upgrade on the 967 for June.
 
--
-- - - - Speaking for myself and not necessarily anybody else - - - - - -
Richard Gambrell        | Internet: [log in to unmask]
Mgr. Tech. Services     | POT:      504-483-7454     FAX: 504-482-1561
Xavier University of LA | Smail:    7325 Palmetto, New Orleans, LA 70125

ATOM RSS1 RSS2