Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 1 May 2000 21:51:24 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thus it was written in the epistle of Jeff Kell,
>
> It isn't good netiquette to sync multiple servers, particularly the
> typical desktop, to a public, high-stratum server.
While I happily agree with the main message Jeff's presenting, I beg to differ
just a little on one detail. The Network Time Protocol is designed to do its
best to find what the time really is from multiple sources, so in our design
here, we have 4 servers which each sync off of about 4 public servers and each
other. That gives us a solid base which we then use to sync the rest of the
campus.
I would agree definitely, though with his comment about syncing the desktop and
as far as "multiple servers" go, we may be one too many here, but I'd be
unhappy to go fewer than three.
Just my half-a-wooden-nickel,
Ted
--
Ted Ashton ([log in to unmask]), Info Sys, Southern Adventist University
==========================================================
A modern mathematical proof is not very different from a modern machine, or
a modern test setup: the simple fundamental principles are hidden and almost
invisible under a mass of technical details.
-- Weyl, Hermann (1885 - 1955)
==========================================================
Deep thoughts to be found at http://www.southern.edu/~ashted
|
|
|