HP3000-L Archives

May 2000, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ted Ashton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ted Ashton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 May 2000 21:51:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Thus it was written in the epistle of Jeff Kell,
>
> It isn't good netiquette to sync multiple servers, particularly the
> typical desktop, to a public, high-stratum server.

While I happily agree with the main message Jeff's presenting, I beg to differ
just a little on one detail.  The Network Time Protocol is designed to do its
best to find what the time really is from multiple sources, so in our design
here, we have 4 servers which each sync off of about 4 public servers and each
other.  That gives us a solid base which we then use to sync the rest of the
campus.

I would agree definitely, though with his comment about syncing the desktop and
as far as "multiple servers" go, we may be one too many here, but I'd be
unhappy to go fewer than three.

Just my half-a-wooden-nickel,
Ted
--
Ted Ashton ([log in to unmask]), Info Sys, Southern Adventist University
          ==========================================================
A modern mathematical proof is not very different from a modern machine, or
a modern test setup: the simple fundamental principles are hidden and almost
invisible under a mass of technical details.
                         -- Weyl, Hermann (1885 - 1955)
          ==========================================================
         Deep thoughts to be found at http://www.southern.edu/~ashted

ATOM RSS1 RSS2