I believe I have previously posted regarding my recent experience with
Tivoli Maestro on NT under less than ideal conditions, all of which are
essentially the fault of the PHB parties who made decisions that I am
probably not at liberty to disclose. Four members of this ad hoc twelve
member Maestro team have since quit; I regularly wonder why my current
contact has not as well. They are all new to this product. My first
contact, the fourth member of the group to leave, told me that the
Maestro for NT product was a port of the UNIX product to the POSIX space
on NT. Eep. The master could not meet their enterprise needs, so they
use a UNIX master, and NT clients. I think of what I've read about some
of the MS POSIX tools: that the only good thing about them is that they
are bundled, and some people like freeware offerings better than these
tools (as for me, we use the ftp server, and are happy with it). But
this does not bode well for other ports. I would not blame Maestro for
NT's behavior on NT, per se. I hear that subsequent releases of the
product keep getting much improved.

insert std disclaimers