HP3000-L Archives

August 2001, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:19:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
It's easy enough to imagine a feed, a SuprTool extract file, a file that has
been ftped, or some other flat file in batch processing, that someone can
assert with confidence is used once and only once, or maybe even twice
(SuprTool extracts some data, some program crunches it for a report), and
then no more. If the file represents some sizable part of cached data, then
getting rid of it immediately, so as to reduce the chance that someone
already in the cache and definitely useful later does not age out of cache.

Of course, it's also easy enough to be wrong about these things, but no more
so than a lot of other popular batch processing mistakes, such as reports
that are WORN. Written Once, Read Never.

Greg Stigers
http://www.cgiusa.com

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2