HP3000-L Archives

March 1999, Week 5

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Off Topic: Windows 95, Y2K, and Windows 2000
From:
Jeff Hanson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeff Hanson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 15:24:35 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
> Jim writes:
>
> I see in ComputerWorld that EDS is upgrading all of their desktops
>  to Windows 98 because they say that MS told them that Windows 95
>  will not be Y2K-compliant and that there will be no migration path
>  from Windows 95 to Windows 2000.
>
>  Can one (or more) of the Windows experts here clarify this for me?

Ok, I guess now I am confused as well.  I remember reading that one
could upgrade from 95 to 98 or beyond, if your version of 95 was osr2
or later.  I guess the vast majority of 95 boxes have the 16-bit
version of 95 where osr2 and later were 32-bit os's.

Hate to add to the confusion.  Anyone else?

jeff hanson
Denkor Dental Management Corp.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2