On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:55:43 +0000, J Dolliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Am I missing something here? Let's see there were 4 planes that were 
driven into buildings and the ground flown by 19 members of a rogue 
organization and better than 1/2 of them were from UAE. The funding of such 
organizations that sponsor terrorists mostly come from where? Let's not 
forget that there was another attack on the WTC back in 1993 but failed to 
take the building down. And who were they?
>
> Sorry, I am not open to understanding the logic behind this at all. Even 
if you have a legitimate organization and can prove it I would still have 
to say "what are you nuts".  Why don't we just give up homeland security 
while there at it.

It is happening. The outsourcing list:
Mexico controls the Southern Border
Columbia controls the DEA
Afghanistan the airports

BTW, the role of the UAE in terror isn't that clear.
2 of the Sept. 11, 2001 hijackers were from the UAE and funding for the 
terror plot originated from that country.

If it fails, more no-bid-contracts for Hallibuton and friends.
I am all for it. ;->

Who voted for this idiot?

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *