Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Paveza, Gary |
Date: | Thu, 14 Oct 1999 13:56:41 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yep, permissions on all the accounts are the same. The programs are all the
same. Their capabilities are the same (it is built from the same command
file).
I can understand an image error, but I don't understand why it only occurs
on this one machine. If that were the case, I would expect this same error
on the other 4 systems .
Haven't given up but really scratching my head :-)
-------------------------------
Gary L. Paveza, Jr.
Technical Support Specialist
All opinions are mine and not those of my employer
-----Original Message-----
From: Emerson, Tom # El Monte [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 1:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: program runs from session but not job?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paveza, Gary [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> Here's one to stump the guru's out there (Okay, someone will
> probably come
> up with a quick answer, but I'm stumped at least).
You did check the obvious: program has BA capability [and user and
group and
account]?
> From a
> jobstream, I get
> the following error whenever a client connects:
>
> 24 :RUN E000000.EXEC
> 25
> 26 Starting server.
> 27 Client number 1 accepted on socket 11.
> 28 Calling p000000 with socket 12.
> 29 Closing socket 11.
> 30 **** Data memory protection trap (TRAPS 68). ABORT:
> E000000.EXEC.METRI
BIG clue follows:
> CS NM USER 5c4.010043ec dbexplain+$458
unless you've written your own "dbexplain" intrinsic, I would
suspect you've
passed something to an Image call incorrectly (perhaps not aligned
on a word
boundary?) I take it your socket handler program doesn't use Image,
so I'd
look at the spawned program to figure out how/why it's working
differently
in batch than online
> 31 NM PROG f61.00017cec p000001+$b08
>
> I have made sure that I am running it as a session using the
> same user name
> as that of the jobstream, but it still doesn't work. The
> account and groups
> on this machine are setup the same as other machines (actually,
used
> BULDACCT to migrate the account).
>
> Anyone have any ideas? Or anyone know what that trace is showing?
>
> -------------------------------
> Gary L. Paveza, Jr.
> Technical Support Specialist
> All opinions are mine and not those of my employer
>
|
|
|