I should have stated that this source is for a PDL that has been compiled a
number of times (although, not under this version of the OS and/or
PowerHouse), so it's syntactically correct, AFAIK.
Thanks,
Don Harrington
Sr. Systems Analyst
Facilities Applications Support
Shared Services Group
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707 M/C 2R-32 NEW!
Seattle, WA 98124-2207
(v) 206-544-5679 NEW! (f) 206-544-5788 NEW! (p) 206-797-6360
The opinions expressed in this e-mail reflect those of the sender. They do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Boeing Company unless
specifically stated otherwise.
-----Original Message-----
From: Pickering, John (NORBORD) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:00 AM
To: 'Harrington, Don'
Subject: RE: (Non-) Duplicate Record Definitions
I'll make a few suggestions from the point of view of someone who's familiar
with QDD but is a rookiue to PDL. The stuff looks more or less the same but
the biggest difference is the sequence.
The first statement should be "Create Dictionary <filename>". I like to add
the "Nor Preloaded" option to this because I don't use any of the predefined
USAGE thingies.
Then comes the "Systems Options ..." statement. More or less like the old
"Options" statement.
Then comes all the "Element" statements. These really haven't changed much.
Then comes the file and record definitions. This is where most of the change
has occurred. For Image databases you need one file statement for the
dictionary followed by a record statement for each dataset. And I think they
need to be in Image order -- i.e. masters first. For non-Image stuff you
need one file statement, a record statement, the item statements and the
index statements.
Have you got your stuff in this order?
Regards,
JWP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrington, Don [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: (Non-) Duplicate Record Definitions
> Importance: High
>
> Gang;
>
> HP3000, PDL 8.19.C3, MPE/iX 7.0:
>
> Compiling a PDL source, I get errors showing that EVERY (!) record layout
> has already been specified and ALL (!) the ASCs are duplicates, as well.
> Checking the source file gives a contrary indication.
>
> What's going on here?
>
> Thanks,
> Don Harrington
> Sr. Systems Analyst
> Facilities Applications Support
> Shared Services Group
> The Boeing Company
> P.O. Box 3707 M/C 2R-32 NEW!
> Seattle, WA 98124-2207
> (v) 206-544-5679 NEW! (f) 206-544-5788 NEW! (p) 206-797-6360
>
> The opinions expressed in this e-mail reflect those of the sender. They
> do
> not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Boeing Company unless
> specifically stated otherwise.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
