Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:06:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
X-no-Archive:yes
Actually, the post should have been under the Humor byline. After all, it was
dealing with Windows CE which is a joke in itself.
No offense to Minisoft is intended.
Kind regards,
Denys. . .
Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP America, Inc.
(800) 323-8863 (281) 288-7438 Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com www.hicomp.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Roy Brown [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, 24 July, 1998 12:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Humour: 'Plug' and 'Off Topic'
In article <H000103c0a8b813b@MHS>, Glenn Cole <GLENN_COLE@NON-HP-
SANTACLARA-OM10.OM.HP.COM> writes
>Here's a quick suggestion for vendor plugs:
>\<plug\> in the text is fine, but I think some of us determine what to read
>from just the subject line.
>
>In keeping with the loosely-followed convention of "Humor:"
>(or "Humour:" ;) and "Off topic:" in the subject line, how
>about considering "Plug:" ?
>
>It would make subjects like "Promotional Pricing" even more apparent
>(though I believe the intent was there), and provide clarity for
>no-hint-of-a-plug subjects like "Windows CE."
>
>I understand that this alone is not sufficient, but perhaps
>it would help.
>
Good idea. But given that the only relevance to HP3000-L in the 'Windows
CE' post was a vague promise of MS92 for CE 'real soon now', do we need
an agreed hierarchy, where 'Off Topic' always comes before 'Plug' or
vice versa ?
--
Roy Brown Phone : (01684) 291710 Fax : (01684) 291712
Affirm Ltd Email : [log in to unmask]
The Great Barn, Mill St 'Have nothing on your systems that you do not
TEWKESBURY GL20 5SB (UK) know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful.'
|
|
|