HP3000-L Archives

October 1999, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joseph Rosenblatt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 11:17:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (135 lines)
Denys,
Whether the story is true or not it is entertaining. As the article points
out it is the *irony* that makes the story. The humor is there true or not.
Over analyzing humor does not make it funnier.

There is a story, quite possibly untrue, that Dylan Thomas was a speaker at
a roundtable on "Poetry in Film." The speaker before Mr. Thomas, a professor
of film, spoke at length about film being linear and poetry being
non-linear. This confused the poet completely. When it was his turn to speak
Mr. Thomas simply said, "I don't know about linear and non-linear but when
Laurel and Hardy let that piano roll down the staircase, that was poetry."

The point being, enjoy the story.

I agree with you about Urban Legends in general. Many of them are intended
to promote a certain agenda. You all know the type: A certain ethnic group
got special treatment. Someone millionaire was getting welfare. etc.

My final point is keep the funny stories coming. I for one enjoy them and
I'm sure I'm not alone.

Sorry for the waste of bandwidth.

-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Denys Beauchemin
Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 10:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Friday Darwin Award Candidate


X-no-Archive:yes
Sigh.  Another day, another Urban Legend.  Check this URL:
http://urbanlegends.miningco.com/library/weekly/aa072097.htm

Kind regards,

Denys. . .

Denys Beauchemin
HICOMP
(800) 323-8863  (281) 288-7438         Fax: (281) 355-6879
denys at hicomp.com                             www.hicomp.com


-----Original Message-----
From:   David Burney [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Friday, 01 October, 1999 8:03 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        OT:Friday Darwin Award Candidate

I'm not certain of the validity of the source listed at the
bottom of this document. Yet I am certain of it's irony.

This could have been a candidate for the Darwin Awards.


       Subject: Murder or Suicide

        At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science,
  AAFS president, Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the
   legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

        On March 23, 1994, the medical examiner viewed the body of
  Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.
 The decedent had jumped from the top of a ten story building
  Intending to commit suicide.

        He left a note to that effect indicating his despondency. As
 He fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun
 Blast passing through a window, which killed him instantly.

        Neither the shooter nor the decedent was aware that a safety
  Net had been installed just below at the eighth floor level to protect
  Some building workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able
 to complete his suicide the way he had planned.

        Ordinarily, Dr. Mills continued, "a person who sets out to
  commit suicide and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism
 might not be what he intended," is still defined as committing suicide.
That
  Mr. Opus was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below at
 street level, but that his suicide attempt probably would not have been
   successful because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel
  that he had a homicide on his hands.

        The room on the ninth floor from whence the shotgun blast
   emanated was occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing
    vigorously, and he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so
upset
   that when he pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and
 the pellets went through the window striking Mr. Opus.

        When one intends to kill subject A, but kills subject B in
 the attempt, one is guilty of the murder of subject B. When confronted
    with the murder charge, the old man and his wife were both adamant.
  They both said they thought the shotgun was unloaded. The old man said it
  was his long standing habit to threaten his wife with the unloaded
  shotgun.
    He had no intention to murder her.

        Therefore the killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident,
  That is, the gun had been accidentally loaded. The continuing
  investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the
  shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.

        It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's
 financial support and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to
 use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that
 his father would shoot his mother.

        The case now becomes one of murder on the part of the son for
 the death of Ronald Opus. Now comes the bizarre twist. Further
 investigation revealed that the son was in fact Ronald Opus. He had become
 increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
 engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story
 building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing
 through the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself so
 the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.

        ............Very tidy of him.


        (A true story from Associated Press, by Kurt Westervel)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Burney                       [log in to unmask]
Summit Racing Equipment        http://www.summitracing.com
                        ----------
           el ocio es el padre de todos los vicios
                                   -----------
      All opinions expressed herein are my own and reflect,
                  in no way, those of my employer.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2